WordPress remove the Classic Editor (and how to restore it)

This is a rare non-cycling post, but bear with me…

It looks like WordPress have finally done it. In a move that sees post creation go from “easy” to “frustrating” the team at WordPress have removed the old Classic Editor completely from the web version. To create and edit new posts (such as this one) it’s necessary to use the clunky “Gutenberg” editor, which looks and feels like it was designed in the 1990’s by a primary school coding class.

Who actually uses this and thinks it’s better than the Classic version?

In the mobile app you may still be able to access the Classic style editor for now, but WordPress do state that “the classic editor will soon be unavailable for creating new posts” for the mobile version also. The block editor is clunky, adding styles and images is more difficult and the whole look of the Gutenberg editor is incredibly un-user-friendly.

Now of course there IS a way to restore the Classic Editor – BUT – it’s going to cost you. Previously you could install WordPress plug-ins for free, but now you need to pay and upgrade to a Business Plan in order to use this service.

See: https://www.greengeeks.com/tutorials/article/classic-editor-wordpress/

You can also insert a “Classic Block” into the new editor, which almost replicates the Classic Editor, but I found this pretty annoying too. If you know of any other way, please let me know!

14 Comments Add yours

  1. bgddyjim says:

    I can live with the classic block. I’ve grown quite used to the whole thing. Didn’t like it, but it’ll do.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I guess I’ll get used to it. I don’t hate it enough to shell out an extra $300 or so (per year) to access the classic editor plugin!

      Liked by 2 people

  2. alchemyrider says:

    I’m with you re the block editor. I miss being able to apply changes, e.g. font size, to the entire document and not have to make the change in each new block.

    I don’t blog enough to make it worth upgrading to the Business Plan. So I’ll just have to put up with the frankly irritating block editor.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I won’t be upgrading either. It’s a pretty expensive yearly fee. Maybe once I create a few more posts being forced to use it I’ll become more accustomed to the way it works. For now though, I’ll just rant! Haha!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. idlecyclist says:

    I use the mobile app almost exclusively and have always used the block editor so I know no different. It’s not the worst interface I’ve used but I guess I’d feel different if I had a better version to compare it with!

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Thanks man. If it’s not broken . . . change for the sake of change?

    Liked by 2 people

  5. I went with the change and adapted to it so now prefer it. When I go back to old posts I had the choice to leave as is or use the block editor, so that’s probably gone now. I do have an upgraded version but wasn’t so much (though $300 is AUS I assume). Anyway, the time’s they are a-changin’.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. They certainly are, and I am just an old man shouting into the headwind…

      Liked by 1 person

  6. thefiftyedit says:

    Agreed with the above. My blog is just a hobby. I have no use to upgrade to an expensive business plan. Disappointed that the Classic Editor has been removed after so many complained about it being removed the first time around.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m slowly getting used to it after creating and editing some drafts, but it just doesn’t seem as user friendly and everything seems to take a couple more “clicks” to complete. A strange move.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. Sam Juliano says:

    For me it is devastating. There are TWO immediate issues that I need to resolve as well when setting posts at my site for others and for myself.

    1.) HOW do I insert photos from my document files? It keeps going to a file of previously posted photos. I want my OWN FILES available as they were on the Classic Editor.

    2.) In CLASSIC it was very easy to click on the icon that “broke” the post with the truncated lines meaning “more.” Again I am not finding that even possible with this awful and user unfriendly Guttenberg.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m sure there’s a “way” of doing everything in Guttenberg that was possible in Classic, it’s just going to take a lot of time and frustration to work it out!

      Like

  8. Sam Juliano says:

    OK I have sorted out and solved the matter of posting photos and now only have the second sissue.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s